Talk:Thamnophis saurita saurita

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The photo of a snake eating a toad is certainly not Thamnophis sauritus - even the author states it's a sirtalis. While it's a nice photo, it doesn't belong on the page. - ADM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.171.225 (talk) 04:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs serious wikification[edit]

This article looks nothing like a Wikipedia article. It looks like some kind of book. Can anyone care to fix this article up? --72.197.35.238 (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism and improper citations[edit]

This article lacks proper Wikipedia citations throughout and at least one case of outright plagiarism. Please correct.

184.237.236.108 (talk) 16:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While this is an old notation, I took a look at the online sources and found that both were obsolete. The other citations are incomplete, so I could not readily verify the source material. I have bookmarked this page for further work. WriterWithNoName (talk) 16:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

venom?[edit]

I recently was bitten by one and want to make sure they are not venomous. Could someone add the information?74.105.16.42 (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Territory[edit]

I'm familiar with the common garter snakes in the region, however, I've come across two Thamnophis sauritus in the last couple of weeks in Cook County IL., just South and West of Lake Michigan. According to source material I found, this snake is not common to the region. Both specimens were black with vibrant gold stripes. One was well over 18" while the other was under 12" and located about two miles apart. Comments? WriterWithNoName (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thamnophis sauritus sauritus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]