Talk:TNT N.V.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

3V[edit]

Why does 3V redirect here (Also linked to at the bottom of the "v" page) if there's no mention of 3V in the article?

TNT[edit]

Anybody know what TNT stands for? I'm guessing it's something Dutch.--Santahul (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Nationwide Transport. It started in Australia. -- Zsero (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this is one thing I find quite deficient about the articles on TNT - very little is discussed of its Australian operations/history before it was acquired/merged and the HQ moved to the Netherlands. From an Australian perspective this is a significant oversight 58.7.101.254 (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)AndrewM[reply]

Global delivery mechanism[edit]

Is it possible to mail a package from TNT to a country other than the 8 European ones they deliver to directly? I seem to remember seeing their logo on packages delivered in the U.S. by a different carrier. -- Beland (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TNT shipping scam[edit]

TNT seems to be mentioned by some scammers, who propose using it as an escrow service (which it is not) - maybe put something about that in the article? --Badger151 (talk) 22:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2007 UK child benefit data scandal[edit]

is this section needed - due to the fact that it does not consern at all TNT on a global level and is on on hand only related to a division and than in UK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.110.224 (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not think it is. Because 1. the mail was unregistered. 2. it is normal to have any postal company to lose a small fraction of unregistered mail. 3. as the summary stated, the mail may not even have been sent via tnt. Andries (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Koninklijke TNT Post be merged into TNT N.V.. I think that the content in the Koninklijke TNT Post article can easily be explained in the context of TNT N.V., and the TNT N.V. article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Koninklijke TNT Post will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment I think it's more clear for the readers. Now there are different articles about the same TNT company: TNT Express, TNT N.V., Koninklijke TNT Post. See for example the Dutch article, wich is more clear: nl:TNT N.V. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]