This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Reference in Swedish is removed, please add further references in English so that all can verify it ! IrfanAli 11:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Foreign-language sources are acceptable in terms of verifiability, subject to the same criteria as English-language sources.--Zleitzen 11:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In the article we have the text "lying about cuba", apart from the Swedish blog I was unable to find any other proof of the accustaion. IrfanAli 12:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the text says 'bluffa om Kuba'. ('Bluffing about Cuba'). In Swedish, 'bluff' can be seems as somewhat milder accusation than 'lie'. Anyway, the text is taken from an unsourced blog commentary, and should substituted by a press report or quote from the quoted flier. --Soman 12:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RS states "blogs are largely not acceptable as sources". Should the accusation from a Swedish blog stay on the article? IrfanAli 12:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
