Talk:Surface Pro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Standardize all the Surface articles[edit]

All of the Surface articles are currently very incoherent.

I propose that we standardize on a common structure.

See: Talk:Microsoft Surface Pro 3#Standardize all the Surface articles Illegal Operation (talk) 22:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest advantage...[edit]

Is this article balanced enough?94.210.251.158 (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The slogan[edit]

Microsoft marketed Surface Pro as "the tablet that can replace your laptop".

Didn't Microsoft just started use this slogan recently with the Surface Pro 3? I don't remember that it used that slogan with the Surface Pro (first generation). TheHoax (talk) 21:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about the original Surface Pro, but that slogan was apparently used for the Pro 2, as seen on its MS Store page (although it could have been added retroactively). As can be seen on this archived version from September 2013, the slogan was used since the beginning.
Looking at an archived version of the Surface family page from November 2013, it uses a very similar phrase "The only tablet to replace your laptop" for the Pro 2.
So the slogan definitely predates the Surface Pro 3, although MS apparently didn't use it that extensively with the Pro 2. However, I cannot find any reference to this slogan being used for the Surface Pro. I've added a "citation needed" tag to the article. Indrek (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to "Surface Pro (first generation)" reverted[edit]

This move smacks of WP:POINT. TheHoax appears to be trying to misrepresent and discredit the prevailing viewpoint at Talk:Microsoft Surface#Reaching Consensus (that parenthetical disambiguation is preferable) by inappropriately and indiscriminately applying it to "fix" non-existent ambiguities (just as he did with the Microsoft Surface article [1]). The move has been reverted, and I strongly encourage TheHoax to stop his disruptive editing. Indrek (talk) 07:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]