Talk:Sumi Jo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sumi Jo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naver cited but deleted as unreliable source[edit]

I see [reversion] citing unreliable source, though this is from a non-blog Naver site that is considered [[1]]. Will revert then copyedit for better language. Battleofalma (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The material added was, as you observe, poorly worded. I then had a look at the source and, because of the comment section, took it to be a blog – which according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources is not a reliable source. I also couldn't find any mention in that Naver article about her being locked up and running away, or about Jo failing a course at SNU because she fell in love with "K.", although the former is mentioned in the source from ezday.co.kr in "Personal life". At any rate, the strained relationship with her mother was already covered in the section "Personal life", so reverting a poorly written edit which partly duplicated existing material and partly failed verification from the cited source was the appropriate action for an article that is governed by WP:BLP. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala[edit]

Section Legacy "... is a difficult piece with high notes over 20 minutes in length."

If the high notes last twenty minutes how long is the whole aria?

I think this should remain, eminently suitable for a hagiography.

For some balance, add another photograph, showing the singer with a microphone.

AnnaComnemna (talk) 14:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]