Talk:Subli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Subli has been translated to English, but...[edit]

This article, which was previously marked with a translate-to-English-or-get-deleted tag, has been translated directly from Tagalog to English. However, the article is poorly written (as its Tagalog version was also poorly written) and is desperately in need of attention from someone who is interested in the subject. Micasta (talk) 10:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.accu.or.jp/ich/en/arts/A_PHL4.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also removing the other two sections as probable copyright violations of their sources. The given URLs are dead, so I can't verify this directly; but if you look at the history you will see that the three sections were added by the same IP on the same day. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]