Talk:Strapless dress

Libby Holman?

Erm, the Libby Holman dress could potentially be a halterneck, the ties just not visible from the angle the photo shows. Are there any other existing photos that show it is, indeed, strapless? magentafeelings (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Good question. When it was substituted, I did look very closely myself too, because I was dubious myself. For the era, I'd expect to see something much more substantial, halter-wise. You can see it's pretty tight around the torso where the fastenings are clearly stretched down the side seam. You can enlarge the photograph to a really large size on Wikimedia Commons, and I don't see any sign of a halterneck there, not even the slightest hint of a tiny spaghetti strap around her neck or showing between the dangles on her earrings. Mabalu (talk) 01:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Straplessness listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Straplessness. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.contrado.co.uk/blog/history-white-wedding-dresses-changed-world/ and https://www.mamamia.com.au/strapless-wedding-dresses-why/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)