Talk:Steve Coll

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The criticism section on this is ridiculous. You took one article where someone disagreed with what he had argued and that constitutes a section on his biography? I recommend that that gets removed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.232.191 (talkcontribs)

I agree, this section doesn't even approach objectivity or anything that would be appropriate in an encyclopedia; removing it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.165.235 (talkcontribs)

I've taken the liberty of citing the section. It's not unusual for a journalist or public servant to have a criticism section of some kind. To my view, everything said in the section is backed by the Atlantic article linked. BusterD (talk) 22:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

1. Have commenced tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2. I have removed the podcasts from the Bibliography and put them in their own section. Online contributions to newyorker.com have been identified. Thank you to other editors for including these resources. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 03:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3. Another editor has decided to reduce the scope of the Bibliography, but previous entries can be accessed via the "View history" link if necessary. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]