This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge Wikiproject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
Can I point out, as a chorister at King's College, that the Dean of King's did not retire: he caught cancer and sadly died a month later. Please check your sources.
Er... the article doesn't say anything about the Dean of King's. Ben Finn 14:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
St John Passion is missing in the list of recordings. I think it's from 1996 (?). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ursulinskaja (talk • contribs) 21:19, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
David Willcocks, his predecessor in charge of Kings, was instrumental in continuing to develop the clean tone of English vocal technique, further pursued by Emma Kirkby. However, Stephen Cleobury has not continued that development, and seems to have lost his way following the failure of the experimental and avant-garde styles he attempted to espouse in the 1980s. It is, for example, noticeable that Cambridge also hosts John Rutter, arguably the world's leading choral composer, who works with the Cambridge Singers rather than either Kings' or St Johns'.
His policy is clearly piecemeal, not pursuing any coherent logic in any thread other than to be controversial.[1] This is in part because there has been little agreement between avant-garde composers as to where they are taking music, each living in his own little bubble without any great cross-fertilization from his peers and less still from his predecessors. It is one thing to claim fame for notoriety and another for innovative development, and Kings was not the place for the former. The very fact that Cleobury never looked back on his past contributions speaks volumes in this, that he's not learning anything from them, and by not learning is not adjusting his course, which hardly matters as he seems to have none.[2]
Given this, is it NPOV to exclude the criticism of his work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.173.156 (talk) 14:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure this is the time! But in the longer term, provided you can find reputable sources, and provided (please) you will avoid any scintilla of gratuitous ad hominem waspishness, there is no reason why you should not start a section on "Musical policy" in the entry itself. Any opinions should clearly be the opinions of the (authoritative) sources that you cite, however, and not the opinions of a mere humble wiki-contributor! We get too much of that - IM(H)O - already in entries on Cambridge academics! Success Charles01 (talk) 19:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
^The author Anthony Horowitz described the work of Phillip Glass as being "the kind of music which one line can take five minutes to play". BBC Radio 3 1430GMT 14.12.2013
