Talk:StarWind Software
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Current direction of the article[edit]
I'm a little concerned at the current direction of the article. Editors would do well to look at well-known entries in Category:Software companies for ideas on the typical shape and structure of an article on a software company. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
That's exactly what I'm busy with ATM. Thank you for your hint in any case! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Tagging the article as such due to the following;
See WikiProject Spam report for full Spam report.
- " ...and what we currently have (please take a look @ our page ... Staff had did a lot of mistakes in the past but they had be punished for doing this (content was removed). "
- " thank you very much for supporting us ... Do we look better? "
- "we've ... Can we stay? "
- " We've added referenced ...Is this enough to stay or we should do something more?"
- " Could you please check our page again to say is it OK or not. And BTW, why our content is a SPAM and DataCore (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataCore_Software) is not? "
- " Please allow us keep the page. And don't call spammers - we're not"
- " That's not a PR. It's just an attempt to show the truth to everybody. Pretty much what we do here."
- Known Accounts identified as AK47 aka user APS (Full Auto);
- 213.238.8.10 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
- APS (Full Auto) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
- 213.238.8.5 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
- 46.211.183.244 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
- 46.211.183.232 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
- 46.211.183.201 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
- 46.211.183.197 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
1) "We" are me (major editor of the article as you've probably noticed), people who !vote'd "stay" and people who did not !vote "stay" but provided a contribution in a way of an edit, hint or just a good kick in the butt (whose efforts were being contstructive in the other words). I call these people "we" and a "team". Teamwork is what's driving Wikipedia I think.
2) This (BTW, incomplete) list of IPs do belong to me. But as you noticed I've always signed with my name "AK47" so your idea about silent spam is ridiculous. I've just contributed w/o creating an account initially. Then I've created an account. Everything is within Wiki policy.
3) Article has nothing in common with the original one and people who're contributing here don't look like having any relation with SW. So I don't see where you've managed to find COI (again).
APS (Full Auto) (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Your contributions, consist entirely of promoting StarWind Software. Few people will edit tendentiously or argue ad nauseum topics in which they have no connection.
Looks like a duck to me--Hu12 (talk) 11:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
1) It should take 10 seconds or so to check my contributions / edit pattern to find out what you say is simply not true.
2) Few people fly to space, win Olimpic games, get nominated on Nobel Prize and edit wiki on persistant basis @ the time majority is passive. So I'm not sure what your complain here is.
Good luck!
APS (Full Auto) (talk) 08:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
OK, I'm done...[edit]
I think I'm done with this page... Back to sand, beach and kids :) P.S. Somebody who has English as his native language please make it look readable :) Thank you! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Swapped out COI with Cleanup tag[edit]
I've changed the COI template to a cleanup template. It appears the discussion on COI has gone cold for 5 months and I don't see any indicators that COI is a problem. I do see that formatting and content may be an issue. For instance, the review and awards sections could either be converted to lists or break down the awards and reviews by product. I don't really have the time right now to do this, but maybe someone else will. --NINTENDUDE64 21:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)