Talk:Solicitor-General (New Zealand)

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Inflammatory claims[edit]

I do not believe publicwatchdogs is a reliable source. It is obviously a personal site, and appears to be linked to by very few other sites. kiwisfirst is also a personal site with very few incoming links. The two sites link to each other. Most of the other incoming links are from blogs. Both are obviously pushing some ideas about corruption. They are not acceptable as sources for Wikipedia.

TVNZ is a reliable source, but their report does not include the inflammatory wording that has been added to the article. While the request to jail for contempt is described as unprecedented, it appears to be undue weight to deal with this specific case in such a short article.-gadfium 21:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. This clearly demonstrates how Wiki can be manipulated by someone with a politicial axe to grind. Create a juvenile blog, make a wild claim, add the claim to Wiki and use the blog as a reference. Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 00:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]