Talk:Sky Skipper/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DasallmächtigeJ (talk · contribs) 11:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
1. Is it well-written?[edit]
In short, yes. The layout seems perfectly fine, so does grammar/spelling. Would lose the "mysteriously" in the preservation section though.
2. Is it verifiable with no original research?[edit]
Yes, the article is meticulously sourced. All sources are reliable.
3. Is it broad in its coverage?[edit]
'Yes.. It covers everything from development, gameplay, to the release and preservation efforts.
4. Is it neutral?[edit]
Yes.
5. Is it stable?[edit]
Yes. Absolutely nothing is going to change here.
6. Is it illustrated?[edit]
Yes, sufficiently.
Conclusion[edit]
After examining the article, I conclude that it qualifies for an immediate pass.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- I also have no idea why it wasn't copied here in the first place but now it seems to be settled.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)