Talk:Simply Nailogical

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Holo Taco[edit]

Just noting that I'm listing the website for Holo Taco - the official website looks to have been last updated in 2016 so the Holo Taco website wouldn't be listed on it. I'm a little leery listing it, but it should be acceptable per EL guidelines. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 20:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography listing?[edit]

I'm looking through some of her written works and some have some decent amounts of citations to them, such as the below ones:

  • "Mental health and contact with police in Canada, 2012". Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2015, with Jillian Boyce and Maisie Karam. (21 citations)
  • "Police-reported sexual assaults in Canada, 2009 to 2014: A statistical profile". Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2017. (18 citations)
  • "Prostitution offences in Canada: Statistical trends". Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2016. (11 citations)
  • "Social determinants of health for the off-reserve First Nations population, 15 years of age and older, 2012". Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2016. (11 citations)
  • "From arrest to conviction: Court outcomes of police-reported sexual assaults in Canada, 2009 to 2014". Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2017. (10 citations)

By citations I'm referring to publications that cite the work, not how many citations they use. I know that this is not what she's really known for, but there are enough citations to where she would generally be seen as a reliable source on her given topic areas and to where we could argue that she is starting to become more noticed for her non-YouTube work. The above works are really the only ones I'd cite, as everything else is below 10 citations at present. Of note is that looking around in Google Scholar (not the best place to look, but I am limited) it does look like her work is mentioned in other scholarly works that aren't included in the citation count number. (See this and this, for example.) ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 21:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been media coverage where she is recognized for this work? We should follow MOS:CONTEXTBIO. lullabying (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is this BBC article the kind of media coverage that would warrant mentioning on her wikipedia page? Mjsupina (talk) 07:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Conflict of Interest and Lack of Sourcing[edit]

Many of the edits on this article are anonymous and come from a Statistics Canada IP address, the same play of employment of the subject of this article. Most of the citations are Tweets by the subject, a company directory, and not cited at all. Much of this content seems to me to be self-promotion and conflict of interest. I am working to delete such content because it is of very questionable value. Content cited as self-promotion and COI has been deleted by named editors and repeatedly added back by anon editors. --Smallison (talk) 11:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I reached out to her via the Holo Taco website to ask about this and to see if they have any sourcing. I don't know if the accounts are her or not, but I've linked them to the conflict of interest guidelines and also pointed them towards some training modules. I've also cautioned them against direct editing and warned them about hiring marketing people to edit. One of my recommendations was that if there's false information in the article, to create a primary source (ie, a YouTube video) where she addresses the incorrect information. It couldn't be used to back up extremely major claims, but it could be used to back up non-controversial claims like the ones tagged in the article at present. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 05:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added Encyclopedic tone template[edit]

I've added tone template to this article as there are numerous statements lacking citations and unsourced content referring to the subject's personality traits, family, unsourced social media statistics, etc. I've gone through much of this article, but there is more to do.