Talk:Siege of Klis

Siege of Klis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 1, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the Ottoman wars in Europe, the Croat feudal lord Petar Kružić defended the Klis Fortress against Ottoman invasion for more than two decades until the final Siege of Klis?

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 12, 2024.

Text and/or other creative content from Klis Fortress was copied or moved into Siege of Klis. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Balkan / European / Ottoman / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siege of Klis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 12:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

After making some grammatical corrections and minor word tweaks, the prose of the content seems in good order, and the content follows MOS guidelines. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

There is no original research in the article; it has good, reputable third-party sources cited, and makes frequent use of inline citations. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all important aspects of the topic for which reliable information is available, and does not contain anything trivial. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's content does not have any neutrality issues. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

No edits in the most recent editing history for the article appear to be any form of edit-warring. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 11:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both the images in this article serve a relevant purpose, and have appropriate captioning. Both are from the Wikimedia Commons and have valid licenses. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 10:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After checking the article thoroughly and making some minor improvements, I feel it is well-ready for GA status. Congratulations! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this was fast! :) Again, thanks for help with grammar. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]