Talk:Shroud of Turin/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA status. My review should be posted within the next few days. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I feel this article is not yet at GA status. Please feel free to renominate once the below concerns have been addressed. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and formatting[edit]

Generally speaking, don't wikilink dates or years
Don't include "th" in dates
ToC is too long - some of the shorter subsections should be merged
Be consistent in using UK or US English - see WP:ENGVAR
Lead should be condensed to 4 paragraphs per WP:LEAD
Don't link the same term multiple times, especially not in close proximity
Don't link common-knowledge terms like beard; do link less-familiar terms like Battle of Poitiers
"French Knight" - why is "Knight" capitalized?
1532 is the 14th century, not the 15th
"states that Apostle Peter found multiple pieces of burial cloth after the tomb was found open, strips of linen cloth for the body and a separate cloth for the head." - repetitive, grammar
Be more consistent in when "Shroud" and other sometimes-proper nouns are capitalized
"many of these marks" - what marks?
"Anatomical forensics" section is quite listy, and could be reorganized to flow better
Avoid one-sentence paragraphs and one-paragraph subsections
Numbers under 10 should be spelled out
"PhD Thesis" - PhD should be linked, thesis should be lower-case
Use a consistent format for dates

Accuracy and verifiability[edit]

{{dead link}} should be addressed
Footnotes should appear after punctuation
"(Piero Ugolotti, 1979)" - parenthetical citation is inconsistent with the footnotes that are otherwise used
"in the 19th century it was first photographed during a public exhibition" - source?
"The history of the shroud from the 15th century is well recorded. In 1532, the shroud suffered damage from a fire in a chapel of Chambéry, capital of the Savoy region, where it was stored. A drop of molten silver from the reliquary produced a symmetrically placed mark through the layers of the folded cloth" - source?
"thereafter Church officials generally refrained from officially commenting on the photograph for almost half a century." - source?
"Catholic devotions to the Holy Face of Jesus have been almost exclusively associated with the image on the shroud." - source?
"Very few scientists (e.g. STURP and the Radiocarbon dating teams) have had direct access to the shroud or very small samples from it, and most theories have been proposed "long distance" by the analysis of images, or via secondary sources" - source?
"McCrone (see painting hypothesis) identified these as containing iron oxide, theorizing that its presence was likely due to simple pigment materials used in medieval times. Other researchers, including Alan Adler identified the reddish stains as type AB blood and interpreted the iron oxide as a natural residue of hemoglobin." - source?
"Similar results have been obtained by former stage magician and author Joe Nickell" - source?
Use a consistent reference format
All web citations need access dates and publishers
All print citations need page numbers
What makes this a reliable source? What about this? This?
Don't repeat cited sources in External links
Identical references should be combined - see WP:NAMEDREFS

Broad[edit]

There's a bit too much detail on scientific perspective compared to the rest of the article

Neutrality[edit]

Maintain a neutral and encyclopedic tone at all times

Stability[edit]

No issues noted

Images[edit]

Shroud-of-Turin-1898-photo.jpg‎ - PD-old does not apply because the creator died only 69 years ago. Same problem with other Pia image
Shroud_of_Turin_1898_poster.jpg - source does not provide evidence that author died more than 70 years ago - PD-old may not apply
Discyellow.jpg - source does not support the assertion that permission for use on Wikipedia was granted
Glebionis_February_2008-1.jpg - image description page contradicts image caption