Talk:Sejong Science High School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tags[edit]

Please do not just remove the tags. Attempt to fix the issues first. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Removal of tags[edit]

Again I ask you, as I have on your user discussion page User talk:24.23.176.171, to please not just remove the tags with no attempt to fix the issue and no explanation as to why you are doing so. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Continued tag removal[edit]

The tags were removed again without explanation and with no attempt to correct the issues. Please refrain from this behavior. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Sources and tone[edit]

The only source used is the school's official website. The peacock terms and claims in this entry read like an advertisement. I have been unable to get the other editor to respond to my concerns. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

3O Agreed. There are no citations. Article reads like an advertisement. Tags are applicable.Startstop123 (talk) 16:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored tags[edit]

I restored the tags again, but accidentally marked it as a minor edit. Thanks. Wperdue (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]