Talk:Sectional aeronautical chart

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

I would need someone to help me properly edit this page once I gather all the information. I am new to wikipedia.

Suggestion[edit]

I left the following suggestion for Stratoflyer who converted it back to a stub from my redirect:

Hi Stratoflyer! I'd like to make a suggestion about Sectional Chart. I'm thinking that it might be better to have that be a redirect to Aeronautical chart, then put in subsections for sectionals, terminal charts, ifr enroute, etc. My thought it that it might be more valuable to see the various types next to each other to establish better context for folks who are new to the subject. Your thoughts? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Adding VFR checkpoints[edit]

Maybe consider VFR checkpoints to the article, they are pretty important. Eason Y. Lu (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]