Talk:Secretary of State for Defence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Denis Healey.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Denis Healey.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replace column heading 'Ministry' with 'Government'?[edit]

In the tables of who has served in the role, the final column is headed 'Ministry'. It contains a short description of who the Prime Minister was and how many times they had formed a government. 'Ministry' seems a funny term for this column. Would 'Government' not be better? SandJ-on-WP (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility[edit]

I'm concerned that the use of (fore example) rowspan=2 markup in the tables on this article hinders accessibility for the users of screen-reading software. @RexxS and Graham87: who understand this well, for confirmation and advice. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy: screenreaders have made improvements over the years and most up-to-date screenreaders will cope moderately well with simple rowspans. That's not to say that the rowspans don't sometimes make navigation around the table more awkward, especially in complicated cases, but it seems to be much better than it was when we first started campaigning to improve the experience for users of assistive technology. Graham will be able to give you greater detail and a flavour of how rowspans affect his browsing, I'm sure.
My advice is to encourage editors not to use rowspans (that also improves functionality by making sorting more amenable), but don't end up in an argument over the issue. Once you've explained to others how they can improve the experience for visually impaired visitors, it's then a matter for their conscience whether they are prepared to compromise on their favoured layouts to accomplish that. --RexxS (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it's fine in this case. Screen readers have gotten more accurate over the years about reporting a user's position in the table when spans are present. Graham87 05:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]