Talk:Sebilj in Sarajevo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sebilj in Sarajevo[edit]

... is probably most popular sebilj in the world, but there are lot of sebiljs around the world, especially in Turkey Images of many other sebils in Istanbul. I will edit a text a little in order to make this fact clear.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I made mistake. After looking at article Sebil on Turkish language I saw that there are bigger, more beautifull and probably more popular Sebils around the world than this in Sarajevo. I propose to make disambiguation page for Sebil and to make link to this Sebilj in Sarajevo.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to withdraw the proposal. Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Sebil (drinking water facility) be merged into Sebilj. I think that the content in the Sebil (drinking water facility) article can easily be explained in the context of Sebilj, and the Sebilj article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Sebil (drinking water facility) will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Malware Link Removal[edit]

USED for MALICIOUS ACTIVITY: (Web site identified with Black-hat SEO SPAM)

--Gary Dee 06:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sebilj in Sarajevo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sebilj in Sarajevo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]