Talk:Scottish Rite Cathedral (Pasadena, California)

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 August 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

notability[edit]

I suggest discussion of this topic's notability should take place here. This article's topic has mentioned in passing in a wp:ANI discussion and elsewhere.

About sources available to develop this article, i expect that the Pasadena Historical Society would be one good source of materials. Also some Los Angeles area editors have shown expertise in getting LATimes archive articles; there is also the Pasadena Weekly which might be checked. The building itself, which i have seen, is quite imposing and is interesting architecturally. It is certainly unusual. --doncram (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If NRHP listing is the notability requirement, then by admission of the article itself, this building does not meet that criterion. Therefore it is not notable. MSJapan (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And, rather than discuss here, within moments you opened the AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Rite Cathedral (Pasadena, California). Okay, discussion of this article topic's notability should continue there, instead. --doncram (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's so hard about "not on NHRP = not notable, and not notable = no article"? You're making vague statements about significance in social history and architectural significance, yet you state nothing to prove either point. So how are you showing any sort of compliance with the GNG in this article? MSJapan (talk) 18:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MSJ. I think it's worth being clear that NRHP listing is not the same as the GNG, and the fact that this building isn't NRHP listed doesn't automatically mean that there aren't sufficient sources to meet the GNG. Notwithstanding that the burden of evidence does sit with Doncram on this.

ALR (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability being considered in the AFD. --doncram (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

photos of building under construction, plus[edit]

Photos of the building under construction and other materials are available in an Online Archives California archive, per reference i added to the William C. Crowell article, referenced again here.^[1] Crowell was a builder and/or architect.

^ "Guide to the William C. Crowell Collection, 1901-1981" (PDF). (includes short bio and index of works). Online Archive of California.

I wonder if these materials are scanned and available online somehow, or whether it is just the archive summary/index information that is online. Probably the materials are not scanned. It appears the boxes of materials would be available for review by appointment at the Pasadena Historical Museum, on Walnut Street in Pasadena. --doncram (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[oac-1] "Guide to the William C. Crowell Collection, 1901-1981" (PDF). (includes short bio and index of works). Online Archive of California.

[1]