This article was nominated for deletion on 17 May 2022. The result of the discussion was soft delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I've found a couple sources here and here plus I'm certain I can dig up more , but I don't have time to find them or add them and the content to the article right now, but I wanted to stress that per both WP:FILMMAKER and WP:ENTERTAINER we can assume notability if we can establish The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. and Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. We are also required to establish ...such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work..., but much of this has already been established for us by the fact that the article has links to a collection of notable works by the subject. Just need to incorporate the sources to verify. Will try to finish when I am able. Huggums537 (talk) 21:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed this on RFUD. Those are two sources, yes, but neither of them convey any in-depth information about this subject. They merely mention him once as they discuss other subjects in depth. WP:GNG supersedes WP:FILMMAKER and WP:ENTERTAINER. I'll wait before nominating this for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My read of WP:N is not that GNG supersedes any SNG's, but that we have an option to use one or the other. Huggums537 (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, per WP:BASIC multiple sources may be combined to establish notability if any given source does not convey substantial in depth coverage. There are several other sources to dig up. There just needs more time to do it. I ask you Muboshgu to abandon the deletion process on the article. Huggums537 (talk) 08:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu, thanks for being super patient with me. I finally got around to finding better sources and expanding the article a bit. I think the notability is no longer an issue now, but we still have a lot of unverified stuff remaining. I'll have to work on it again some other time. Huggums537 (talk) 00:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
