Talk:Scarfolk

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 11 June 2014 by reviewer APerson (talk · contribs).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

Notability?[edit]

I'm a big fan of the website, but is it notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page? It seems little more than an advert for the book ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objections after a week: I've nominated the page for deletion. I am aware that there is a previous nomination, but given that there has been no further work since then, the book is nothing more than a passing novelty ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think there is enough notability. The Scarfolk site is still very active, just yesterday there is news of a upcoming you tube channel. [1] just before christmas there was some starwars medical merch. [2]. These show there is more than just the book. A merge might be in order, but perhaps the other way as this page has the broader scope. As there is scope for discussion I've declined the prod. --Salix alba (talk): 15:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated for deletion last time round. Continued coverage and activity has definitely pushed the site into notability for me now. However, I think the book article might be better just being merged into this as it has minimal content. Blythwood (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

More controversy - worth a mention?[edit]

UK government accidentally included Scarfolk poster, in some material and received a C&D.

Reference to article in Boing Boing [3].

Jonasbn —Preceding undated comment added 20:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]