Talk:Satavahana dynasty

Did Pallavas succeed Satavahanas?

1. If Pallavas were feudatories of Satavahanas, they would have declared their independence in 225 CE (1st quarter of 3rd century CE) itself. First sovereign Pallava king ruled around the 4th quarter of 3rd century CE. 2. Velurpalayam Plates of Nandivarman III states that the first Pallava King Virakurcha simultaneously with (the hand of) the daughter of the chief of serpents grasped also the complete insignia of royalty. 3. Pallavas succeeded Nagas, not Satavahanas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senthamizhselvan93 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

/* Language */ Origin and transformation of languages Prakrit, Pali,Desh,Sanskrit,Telugu

On 24/3/2022 at 22:12 My edit was reverted and 1078483771 by Rodw was restored by User talk:Vif12vf on 26/3/22 at 18:13 Restored revision 1079078499 by Vif12vf (talk) on 26/3/22 at 23:57 Restored revision 1079314662 by Vif12vf (talk) 1)It was clearly mentioned about languages used at Satavahana Dynasty. Reference to Book Andhra Darshini 1954 has been provided in Telugu Language.If any one like to read the contents they can ask publisher/library if they don't believe my digital picture evidence. If digital picture of Page 28 is fine, then download and translate to verify contents. I had even provided evidence of Gunadhya and his Brihatkatha which was written in Paishachi. These are wiki articles. I have not created them. One can check articles to confirm Paishachi language links to Satavhana's/Andhras. Gunadhya is born to a Andhra Brahmin Girl(Kanya) and "Naga" tribe father. One can even check Gunadhya's period and his contemporay personalities in Andhras. 2)Then comes to Sanskrit introduction. Narration of Sharva Varma teaching Kuntala satakarni with Kamtantra grammer was written in Brihatkatha book by Gunadhya Check the article and book in Paishachi after translation for verification. 3) Pali Language usage in Buddhism literature. I had provided wiki article as evidence with Abhidhamma Pitaka and chinese traveller Xuanzang wiki page as evidence where in he stayed at Amaravati and studied these books written in Pali language. All references were provided from those articles.

I did not revert any one else's Edit.Just added my content. But User talk:Vif12vf reverted my edit unilaterally. He did it 3 times.I did not revert any ones or his edit. He could have discussed this matter before reverting changes despite references cited to edits made. If iam wrong i dont mind getting blocked from editing when there is no transparency exists.But i had provided all information from with in wiki articles.Does it mean all those wiki articles are wrong? It is our emperors history. We have studied it in depth since childhood.Why do we make erroneous attempts to malign his reputation and our reputation in directly. I would like to see explanation from user talk:Vif12vf why he has decided to revert changes?Any justification? Feel free to ask me if you still have any doubts. I have 1213 pages of 1954 printed book evidence Andhra Darshini in Telugu.Any one can get their copy if available in libraries or digital format. If necessary i will send picture of page 28 again for verification purposes. In this article there are many if's and buts. Some are not even sensible.Fictional.But all stories are stored in article. Sata in Satakarni meaning is not hundred. Sata in Prakrit/Sanskrit means Lion. Even today one can find name "SataRupa" means "Lion Faced". Check Indian citizen names data base in West bengal or in USA. By accident also SataRupa can not mean Hundred faces.No body would like to call him/her as multi faced.It is disgraceful meaning to have as name. These satavahana kings did not have jurisdiction to Tamil land.Not even Chandragupt Mourya,Ashoka of Mauryan Empire. Before Devanagari script even Sanskrit was written using Brahmi script. Any Dravidian language will have similar script close to Brahmi script. That is all for now. Can be elaborated if necessary.DeepakMalhar (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeepakMalhar (talk • contribs) 17:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Satavahanas were known as Andhrabhṛityas not Andhras

Andhrabhṛityas means the "Servant of Andhras" not Andhras "People of Andhra", as mentioned in inscriptions, even Historians refer the same as per the records belonging to them

Ref :

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.280089/page/n11/mode/1up?q=Andhrabh%E1%B9%9Bityas CatTheMeow (talk) 06:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Replacing highly inaccurate map of Satavahnas

I'm planning to replace the highly inaccurate map of the Satavahanas, which combines different historical eras into one. This map erroneously includes territories of the Sakas within the Satavahana Kingdom, particularly Gujarat. The cited source is unreliable as it merges various time periods. As demonstrated in the Vijayanagar Empire article, I will upload a more accurate map that I found in the Gautami Putra Satakarni article. DeepstoneV (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)