Talk:Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move this to Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1?[edit]

Shouldn't this be moved over to Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1? --Sakurina (talk) 21:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

In my opinion the "criticisms" section of this page describes criticisms of Samsung's marketing techniques and not of the tablet itself, and so should be removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.238.74 (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the heading to "controversy", does that make it any better? HMishkoff (talk) 16:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edits[edit]

I've never used any kind of tablet or Android device, I was reading the article only because I'm thinking of buying the 10.1 when it's released in a couple of weeks (it looks like it's going to be spectacular), and I couldn't resist editing the article when I noticed that there were several issues. My unfamiliarity with the subject resulted in an occasional inability to be certain of the writer's intent, so I apologize if I messed anything up. HMishkoff (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, excuse my english. Good job! Sefford (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sefford, if you're not a native speaker, your English is excellent, no excuses necessary. HMishkoff (talk) 04:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

10.1 North America general release model specifications[edit]

Reviews for the 10.1 model state that it carries the tegra 2 and no native external storage option. I don't know how to link stuff and I'm not sure if wikipedia policy accepts engadget or ubergizmo as sources so I wanted to run this by more experienced users here. The reviews are: http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/08/samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1-review/ and http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/05/galaxy-tab-10-1-review/ Funkopotomis (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy?[edit]

Some editor thinks its controversial or a reliably cited source does? Unless one appears soon, I'm chucking the paragraph about the paid actors. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, I offered editors four days in which to provide reliably-sourced, verifiable citation for the "controversy". None having been provided, away it goes. When someone finds citable references for the comments, it can return. Not before. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency on information between the model and comparison table[edit]

On the side bar it shows the 10.1 has Honeycomb 3.1 with Super PLS display, yet on the comparison it says only the Galaxy Tab 8.9 has the Honeycomb 3.1 and Super PLS. 10.1 and 10.1V only have honeycomb 3.0 and TFT displays.

And I can't edited it because i am unsure which one is actually correct.

Tonio.d.monio (talk) 04:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

German Court and European Union[edit]

"10 August 2011, a German court granted a preliminary injuction pending a full hearing prohibiting Galaxy Tab 10.1 sales in the European Union". This statement is not rigth. The authority of a German court is limited to Germany. In Italy for example, wherein Apple has not convalidate some of the patents which are deemed to be "infringed" by Samsung, you may buy a Samsung Tab without problem in any store. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.92.153.12 (talk) 09:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar[edit]

Several parts of this article have been written by morons with no grasp of even the basics of English grammar. Consequently the article is garbled, unstructured and ambiguous. — Preceding unsigned comment added 18:01, 4 November 2011‎ (UTC) by 77.103.246.116 (talk • contribs), who inserted it at the top of a seemingly random section

Galaxy Tab 10.1 update[edit]

I've received an update on my tablet, I haven't updated yet, but what I'm understanding that it's an update to Android 3.2. There's a new back button, new wireless app, and a Market update with bug fixes throughout the tablet. Devin Davis (talk) 03:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Lawsuit[edit]

The Apple Lawsuit section discusses the status of various lawsuits but not the details of what exactly the lawsuits allege in terms of design elements. =//= Johnny Squeaky 04:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy Tab 2[edit]

The Galaxy Tab 2, model GT-P5113 with Ice Cream Sandwich is now available. You can find them at Best Buy and on eBay in quantity. Should this article include info on the new 2012 model? JettaMann (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jelly Bean, really?[edit]

"The latest OS version for Galaxy Tab 10.1 is Android 4.1.2 - Jelly Bean."

I personally own a Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the latest Android release I can update to is 4.0.3 if I recall correctly. Where are the references for this statement?--TheLazyDog (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]