Talk:SaleCycle

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SaleCycle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Clarification about the subject's Draft[edit]

Hi everyone, I'm making this clarification in order to step forward improving the article: I published the article in the mainspace despite the fact that was in the Afc submission process. The Draft was declined 3 times so far and 2 of them were due to my submissions due to notability issues. I cannot be responsible for the previous edits but I can say that before I handling the article it had neutrality problems and almost none reliable, third-party, independent references. I undertook this action because of the following series of events:

In the first declination, the reviewer's comment was: "Still needs any further available amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall".
I tried to reach the reviewer in order to get a clarification about its comment, with no response.
I tried to follow the recommendation in the comment and I added more sources, trying to stablish the notability of the subject, making my second submission.
Still with doubt, I ask for help and got a broader feedback. I took the recommendations and suggestions.
The article got its second declension about my edition, by the same reviewer, with the comment: "Frankly I simply believe it may be too soon for the applicable notability".
Respecting the belief of the editor, I added the {{notability|Companies|date=April 2016}} template by myself and proceeded to publish the article in the mainspace.

I know for sure that the article needs work, but I'm not a notability expert nor the right person to assure that have it (as the editor who made the changes)... I think its notable, and I warned in the mainspace about a possible notability issue, that's all.Edelmoral (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability template removal[edit]

The result of the WP:AFD discussion was Keep. The issue of the debate was the subject's Notability. The consensus reached indicate that the subject meets the primary criteria of WP:ORG, so it's notable and therefore I did remove the Notability Template of the article. Edelmoral (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]