Talk:Saddlebacking

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

comment[edit]

I disagree and think an entry should be open. There are urban dictionary defintion dates that supercede Dan's definition. This isn't just HIS word. It's A WORD and has been used in slang for awhile compared to the dates of submissions.


Example.

A position that gay men love Ohh, I heard Neil wanted to ride Bob Saddleback..Ouch!

Jul 29, 2003

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=saddleback


This word can be used many different ways and has many possibilities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.220.122 (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2009

Deletion arguments go here Noble Spear (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If enough citations can be found to make a successful comparison to the notability of "Santorum" and "Pegging" as coined by Dan Savage, then an argument can be made that this should definitely not be deleted. But it seems like it will take some more evidence of notability than what's been presented so far. Are there more articles in mainstream press which mention "Saddlebacking" in reference to "Santorum" discussions, etc? Thanks. Teledildonix314 talk 04:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, actually, i've easily found some more press here -- http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/22/yes_we_can_saddelbacking_make
So if it does actually appear to be mentioned in Reliable Sources such as The Economist then i would assume it's quite notable and should definitely not be deleted. Teledildonix314 talk 04:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Existed without a name[edit]

This practice has gone on for years without a proper name. At my (small private) college, I met multiple people who had saddlebacked in order to maintain a reputation. You can read more about this odd phenomenon here [1][2] Gary Seven (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A google search reveals that usage is picking up at a fast pace. Leave it as is.

This is about the word as a neologism not the sexual act per se, -- Banjeboi 17:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

suggestions[edit]

Get rid of the list of seven, these should be summarized as the finalists definitions focussed on ____ with the winner by a far margin being ______. Also Savage's history of successful neologisms should be placed higher and connection why the focus on Saddleback church regarding the Obama choice. With Santorum there was some measures of impact or rankings, does Google or someone track these? That may help. -- Banjeboi 17:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I must thank BenjiBoi and SpotFixer for very nicely fleshing out the citations and summaries of this article. It looks very much "rescued" to me! Way to go! If i see any more appropriate references in our Pacific Northwest media, i will remember to add more of those sorts of Reliable Sources; now that The Stranger and other papers have been discussing the topic, it will almost certainly get mentioned in more of the Seattle-area news reports on topics related to teen health or the Saddleback church's connection to other social and political topics around here.
( - : = Teledildonix314 talk 19:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're very welcome, it's been redirected for the moment but revisit his ina amonth or so and see if some more newspapers don't cover this. -- Banjeboi 09:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]