Talk:S-X

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 29 April 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



S-X (producer)S-X – In 2017, S-X branched out into being a recording artist/singer, so he is no longer just a record producer, and the former is now his primary career - he releases his own artist projects more than he does record production nowadays). For these reasons, I think that the article for "S-X (producer)" should be moved to "S-X" as one can no longer label S-X as just a producer. Timwikisidemen (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of any sources that refer to it as "S-X", rather than "Regulation S-X". A hatnote could be added just in case. 162 etc. (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, whilst I think the nom rationale for ptopic is rather flimsy (I would use (musician) in this situation otherwise), I think that ultimately this name refers to the musician only, so there is no real reason for him not to be the primary topic of S-X. Lazz_R 12:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, I see no other usage of "S-X" on Wikipedia for a article page, therefore the name of "S-X" should surely be used to refer to the musician as the main topic given that fact. Sluggor (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.