Talk:Russian Naval Infantry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title[edit]

Shouldn't this article be moved to Russian Naval Infantry? They're far better known by that name. -- Necrothesp 03:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there sources that would comply with above statement? Just for the sake of accuracy, for I am, being the Russian would be all for “Naval Infantry” as the main article entry. It is a proud branch of our military with specificly sounding name, but we ought to think about conformity. But, as I say, if it is indeed know as such, I’d be the first in line to move it to the proper name.
Interesting sidenote: in 1716, Peter the Great instituted the rank of “marine guard” (Russian: гардемарин, from French: garde-marine). It was exactly that — rank, not the branch of military. It was given to cadets of naval schools, when they were ready to leave classrooms for on-the-ship training, after completion of which they were given officer’s ranks. That rank changed over time and was eventually abolished after Revolution of 1917. theUg 02:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NCDAB, we should use natural disambiguation. I've moved the article to Russian Naval Infantry. Let's see if there are any reasons I've missed. --RexxS (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement links[edit]

https://archive.is/xBVo Vyacheslav84 (talk) 18:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chechnya wars ?[edit]

Russian Naval infantry took part in both Chechnya wars, 1994/96 and from 1999 on to ~ 2009. This was no mention worth ? --88.217.110.160 (talk) 15:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have reliable source(s) affirming it, we'd be more than happy to have it in the article. Cheers! – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 23:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naval Infantry (Russia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization[edit]

Why is "Naval Infantry" capitalized throughout? "Infantry" or "artillery" is not generally capitalized when talking about a military branch. Of course "123 Naval Infantry Brigade" does require capitalization. Shall I change it? --PaulinSaudi (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because the organisation is called the Naval Infantry (Морская пехота, Naval first word, Infantry, second word). What you are suggesting is the equivalent of using "United States Marine corps" throughout the USMC article. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --PaulinSaudi (talk) 15:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]