Talk:Ruskin, Minnesota

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled[edit]

I think this page should not be deleted, because I forgot to add more bibiography. also, I plan to add more text to the page.

About a city that supposedly isn't supposed to be on maps? Who said such, why does this town require encyclopedic notice over other small towns; etc. Sources man, we need sources! And more info! And less "adding info as the article is being created"! When you make an article, it has to be well-sourced, well-written, and well-understood from the get-go. Otherwise, others may dispute the need for the article's existence. Elm-39 (talk) 15:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Final resource. check out the Rice Co. Hist. Society in Faribault. I'm sorry I didn't include this at the start.

Sincerely, Moland Freak —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.2.214.33 (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be better to add that source to the article itself? Elm-39 (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just did it.Moland Freak —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.2.214.33 (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry my page has made you mad, and I am perfectly ok if you delete it, but stay away from the page Moland, Minnesota. -Moland freak —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moland freak (talk • contribs) 16:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]