Talk:Rosenborg BK in European football

Rosenborg BK in European football is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 9, 2011	Featured list candidate	Promoted
January 21, 2012	Featured list removal candidate	Kept

Current status: Featured list

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Norway Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Norwegian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Deportivo[edit]

I became interested in Rosenborg's alleged 0-0-4 record, because Stabæk beat Deportivo in 1999. I checked the table, and I got the record 1-1-2 for Rosenborg against Deportivo, not 0-0-4. Have I misunderstood something? Geschichte (talk) 14:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I spot the record 0-3-3 against both Bayern and Dynamo Kyiv, in only 4 matches. The whole table must be double-checked. Unless I'm mistaken. Geschichte (talk) 14:17, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for pointing that out. I've gone through the table once more, and fixed it up accordingly. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rosenborg BK in European football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5xxwQWfBF?url=http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/intertotocup/history/season%3D2009/intro.html to http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/intertotocup/history/season%3D2009/intro.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5xvNEBEOT?url=http://www.rbk.no/info/article53890.ece to http://www.rbk.no/info/article53890.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]