Talk:Rogfast

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is this being built?[edit]

The article fails to clearly answer the most important question: why is this being built? Does it relieve a bottleneck? Does it speed up a connection? And what was the discussion of alternatives? Does a ferry currently ply that route? Was a rail tunnel ever taken into consideration? Which costs and downsides are associated with not building it? Hobbitschuster (talk) 03:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World Record Status?[edit]

Is it still accurate to say that the tunnel will have "World-record" length now that WestConnex has been finished? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessesl66 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]