Talk:Ro-Busters

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ro-Busters article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comics: British Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by British comics work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Article[edit]

And so it goes. I've started the revamp. The Summary, I think, could do with editing down. I've rewritten the main section and added some trivia, although I need to confirm the episode of "Hammer-Stein's War Memoirs". It's the episode in which one of the human soldiers mentions that, once his tour is over, he'll have work helping to build Mega-City One. Ah, yes. Hammer-Stein spelt using a hyphen. That in itself could be another piece of trivia we could investigate. I would presume the hyphen was dropped during one of the Ro-Busters stories in the annuals or during the Nemesis books. --HalfWhit 20:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started writing up brief synopses for each Ro-Busters story. However, my Starlord collection goes only as far as Starzine 8, so someone else will have to supply the details from there on. --HalfWhit 13:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you stop now and consolidate on the briefest of descriptions and don't both listing individual art and script credits for each. Giving each its own heading is also a bad idea because of the effect on the TOC. GraemeLeggett 14:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was becoming a tad unwieldly. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to have another bash at it. --HalfWhit 17:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Sanders - The Ro-busters TPB has the exact same quote from Mills, but he says that it was Bob Bartholmew's idea, not John Sanders'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.27.240 (talk) 12:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll double check TPO - it may be the attribution was wrong and they corrected it in the Complete Ro-Busters or I've misread it (it'll have to wait until I've shaken off my Xmas lurgey as I'm not really up for the niceties of teasing this out if it is unclear). (Emperor (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]