Talk:Ring-necked snake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

really only species?[edit]

Why does Diadophis redirect here? What about the Diadophis rubescens[1]? Mukk » Talk « 23:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sounds like a great idea for a new entry. go for it! - Metanoid (talk, email) 03:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

authorities[edit]

The parentheses of the subspecies describers need to be checked. --Sarefo 21:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Defensive Posture[edit]

This article requires a picture of the snake in its characteristic defensive posture.

205.173.158.200 (talk) 14:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 August 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Diadophis punctatusRing-necked snakeWP:COMMONNAME / WP:NCFAUNA – This very cute little snake has a well-established unambiguous common name, so let's use it. The suggested target name has redirected here since 2006. —BarrelProof (talk) 06:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Vandalism[edit]

Bogus entry: In 1987, there were stories of the ringneck snake slithering down the throats of unsuspecting victims in the Oakland hills. Witnesses say at least 17 people were killed by this deadly predator 2601:647:67F:5A00:CD58:F8A1:71BE:8725 (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]