Talk:Registax

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy Bottom‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An appropriate image needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be updated. Once this has been done, please remove the `\|needs-image=yes` parameter from this template.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Once this has been resolved, please remove the `\|attention=yes` parameter from this template.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Keep for now[edit]

I know nothing about astronomic software but came across this page from a deleted link on the focus stacking page. From what I can see Registax is notable enough for an article, eg on joe.zawodny.comit says "RegiStax has been around for a long time and is probably the single reason why amateur astronomy has made huge strides in the last several years", there are numerous references to it and tutorials on how to use it (eg [1]). As far as I can see it is a ~~Russian~~Dutch program and ~~the non functioning link~~, www.astronomie.be/registax, is the european mirror ~~(I'm not sure why it is currently non responive)~~. Maybe this article isn't needed if there is a general page on this type of software (I'll go search), but for the meantime I would say keep. I will remove the proposed deletion template. --Tony Wills (talk) 01:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]