Talk:Regia Marina

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regia Marina article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / National / European / Italian / World War I / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	National militaries task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Italy High‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:MilHist Assessment[edit]

This article is easily long enough and detailed enough to warrant no less than B-class. It has pictures, and goes beyond the prose content history of the navy to provide an extensive list of Italian ships, by class. However, I would think that if this article were to be improved at all, it would require significant expansion in just about every section, particularly in the pre-WWII sections. I realize that Italy was a newly formed nation at the end of the 19th century, and the navy was thus new as well, but surely there is more to be said about its activity before and during WWI than just a few sentences. LordAmeth 11:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; I've added a piece on the origins of the RM; I got it mostly from the article on the Italian Wikipaedia Xyl 54 12:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Italian?[edit]

Why is the section about corvettes in WW2 all in italian? Could someone please translate it? I think it is copied from italian wiki.--QueenCake (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It actually appears to be in French, to further the mystery. Benea (talk) 05:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo's, attack on new york[edit]

I found some stuff on a now-defunct page that could live here, so I've added it. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:HMS Queen Elizabeth (Queen Elizabeth-class battleship).jpg[edit]

The image Image:HMS Queen Elizabeth (Queen Elizabeth-class battleship).jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The name[edit]

Someone has changed the words “Regia Marina” in this article to “Royal Navy” or “Italian Royal Navy” for some reason.
This is just confusing; there already is a "Royal Navy" in the English language, and it isn’t this one. And use of the term Regia Marina is a commonplace in reliable sources that cover the subject (Roskill springs to mind); most histories of the First and Second world war do the same.
So I’ve changed it back. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Regia Marina/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The cruisers Taranto and Bari did not form a single class: they were ex-German WW I light cruisers (respectively named Strassburg and Pillau) incorporated in the Italian navy according to the peace treaty and were substantially different from one another. Source: www.regiamarina.net[1] 158.102.162.5 (talk) 10:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 04:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Forth largest navy[edit]

By putting in the {{cn}} tag, I was not questioning the accuracy of the claim that Italy had the forth largest navy at the time--that does sound about right. I'm guessing the top three were: (1) Britain (2) Japan (3) U.S.? It would be nice to spell that out and have a source that documents in and even better gives statistics comparing the various fleets. --David Tornheim (talk) 01:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"traps in your way"[edit]

About the Italian lack of radar, the text says: "range finders and gunnery control devices for night combat were not incorporated. Regarding such devices, Cavagnari emphasized "not wanting traps in your way"."

Since Cavagnari's choice of words may sound strange, I would like to add that while "traps" is a good literal translation for the Italian "trappole", the same "trappole" is used colloquially in Italian with the meaning of "contraptions", "complicated machinery or gadget". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.3.252 (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]