Talk:Red Ventures
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Older comments[edit]
Red Ventures is no longer located in Charlotte, North Carolina.
In 2009, Red Ventures relocated to the 521 Corporate Center, in northern Lancaster County, South Carolina.
Jbaker314 (talk) 03:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Article updated 27 May, 2010 to reflect changes in the business. Red Ventures no longer sells Sirius_Satellite_Radio, so that link was removed. Added links for HughesNet, Clear 4G WiMax, and Miracle-Ear, which are all new clients added since the previous update. Offices in Dallas, Texas and New York City have been closed.
Rturnham (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
deleted content[edit]
Hello, I would like to discuss the inclusion of recognition and rankings which were recently deleted. (See diffs 794593612 and 794644674 ) The edit summary stated "very promotional", presumably implying the content violated WP policy regarding advertising. I disagree that the content meets the definition of promotional/advertising, and I strongly object to the deletion of content without discussion. However, I would like to find a consensus of what, if any, content should be included.
I believe the following should be retained in the article
- The rankings of the company and it's growth rate are very relevant to the company's history and should be included. (refs: [1][2][3][4])
- The awards/recognition should be retained in the corporate culture section. Perhaps the added sentence: Correspondingly, Red Ventures has been repeatedly recognized by Charlotte based newspapers for it's corporate culture.[5][6][7][8][9]
I look forward to the discussion. Dbsseven (talk) 16:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://www.redventures.com/images/pdf/rv_presskit_aug08.pdf
- ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, September 2007
- ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, November 1, 2004
- ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, September 2008
- ^ "Red Ventures on the Forbes America's Best Midsize Employers List". Forbes. Retrieved 2017-03-06.
- ^ "Charlotte's Best Places to Work 2011", Charlotte Business Journal, November 10, 2011
- ^ "Charlotte's Best Places to Work 2010", Charlotte Business Journal, November 4, 2010
- ^ ”Companies honored as Best Places to Work”, Charlotte Business Journal, November 5, 2008
- ^ "Large companies, No. 1 - Red Ventures: Benefits and career chances stand out". charlotteobserver. Retrieved 2017-03-06.
Request edit on 20 October 2022[edit]
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- Remove Chowhound from list of brands owned and operated by Red Ventures:
- Chowhound was closed down in March 2022:
- New York Times ([1]):
Mcmurtrk (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Asimov, Eric (3/10/22). "Chowhound Closes After 25 Years of Food Obsession, Wisdom and Debate". New York Times. Retrieved 10/20/22.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|access-date=and|date=(help)
Information about Wikipedia itself sourced externally[edit]
Information about Wikipedia changing Red Ventures from trusted to untrusted in citations is weirdly cited only to an external site claiming that this happened . There's no citation or link to that alleged decision within a Wikimedia foundation website .
This looks suspect . 77.213.208.88 (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)