Talk:Recollections of Full Years

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Recollections of Full Years appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Recollections of Full Years by Helen Taft was the first memoir published by a first lady of the United States?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Recollections of Full Years.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Recollections of Full Years, by Helen Taft, was the first memoir published by a First Lady of the United States? Source: in lede

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Japan National Route 281

Created by Eddie891 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Eddie891, review follows: article moved to mainspace 21 November; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; a spot check of the sources found no overly close paraphrasing; hook is interesting, mentioned in article and checks out to the Washington Post source; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]