Talk:Reapers' War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Map[edit]

Is the division map enough? --84.20.17.84 12:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The map is not right because it is the Autonomous Comunity of Catalonia, and it is much more modern than the revolt. Then, Catalonia had more territory in the west, which is called now "La franja" (the strip). Catalans is spoken there (in fact it is the place with the highest proportion of catalan speakers). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.152.208.152 (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saying that la franja was on catalonia would not be really correct IMHO. The topic is quite mudded, actually. When the autonomical division of Spain was done, villages on la franja were given the option of what community they wanted to belong to.

The affiliation should probably be studied village by village for these reasons:

For historical reasons: some of the villages on the franja were on Catalonia, others were on Aragon, and all have been at both regions on different times, since the frontier has changed over the time. Many of those villages on la franja were under aragonese laws since the middle age, other were under catalan laws.James I set the frontier between on Aragon and Catalonia on the river Cinca, thus putting all of la franja and a few currently aragonese villages on Catalonia, but it was later set to the river Segre by Peter III, thus putting all la franja and a few currently catalan villages into aragon. Over time, some villages like Lleida moved from Aragon to Catalonia and stayed there.

For demographical reasons: many villages were decimated during la Guerra dels Segadors and repopulated, or have grown almost exclusively with spanish-speaking people (binefar, vencillon?, which are both on Aragon), or created recently exclusively with spanish-speaking people (Gimenells "one of the leridan colonization municipalities, Gimenells", which is on Catalonia). Those villages are no longer or never were considered to be part of la franja and are considered like belonging to either Aragon or Catalonia.

For geographical reasons: important population centers that are very near to each other do not belong to the same community, so using geographical criteria to group the villages would not work. Fraga is very near to Lleida (20 km), but the former is aragonese and the later is catalan.

For linguistic reasons: grouping la franja villages under 1640-1659 Catalonia because of the language spoken on 20th century would misrepresent the real extent of Catalonia political territory at the time. Also, because of colonization and repopulation, it wouldn't even be misrepresenting accurately...

To sum it up, the current frontier is a good approximation of the real extent of Catalonia at that time, and a more detailed map would only change a few villages at the frontier, like, probably, Estopiñán_del_Castillo. The actual map is not perfect, but is good enough until someone produces a more accurate one without using blanket statements like "la franja was part of catalonia" which is not totally correct. (P.D.: caption ought to be changed to include "autonomous community of Catalonia" to further clarify it's not trying to represent the actual extension of Catalonia at the time) --Enric Naval (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not Catalan rebels[edit]

I've reverted the edit that splits the Catalan side in rebels and loyals to Spain. I assume that the user which had made the change hasn't so much idea of the conflict, since it was primarly a war of all the Catalan institutions against the Spanish Crown, and therefore it isn't as simple as putting 'rebels' and 'loyals' in the infobox, given that the 'rebels' agglutinated the governmental institutions of the principality. An acceptable change would be to divide the sides in the 'Government of Catalonia' and 'Spanish Crown'. In any case, describe as rebels (I assume as disorganized group) a solid political core as was the Generalitat is somewhat ahistorical. Of course, before doing so bold changes, I suggest user:Pietje96 to offer his views in this talk page. --Sir Ignel (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National anthem[edit]

To call "The Reapers" Catalan "National" anthem is only a point of view. It is not here, in my opinion the place to discuss whether Catalonia is or isn't a nation. The fairest statement would be "Catalan anthem". Thank you. Ibn Gabirol (talk) 06:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't. It is just the legal definition. See https://portaljuridic.gencat.cat/eli/es-ct/l/1993/02/25/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.176.181.150 (talk) 18:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catalan revolt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 October 2017[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 20:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan revoltReapers' War – This proposed title is already used in English. This is not the only Catalan revolt in history, we already have the Revolt of the Barretinas and current events. PatGallacher (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Widely known by this name in the literature. —innotata 09:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. "Catalan revolt" is vague; "Reapers' War" is specific, and commonly used in English. Scolaire (talk) 13:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.