Talk:Real Love (Beatles song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleReal Love (Beatles song) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
June 26, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
December 15, 2006Featured article reviewKept
May 11, 2010Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Something[edit]

I've just seen this mentioned as how a Featured Article on a song should be, but sorry to say I think it needs some cleaning. There's plenty of sloppy language, and even some quotations without references. It's a very pleasant read, however. --kingboyk 20:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm flattered to be listed as a source (Gordon Hodgson), hope you don;t mind if I update the links to my site to point to their current URLs.--Gordon 21:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?[edit]

I'm not clear about what's being disputed here. Is it disputed that Lennon put the song on the backburner (which, for those who lack a decent command of the English language, means that work on the song was halted)? I don't see any claim in the sentence that the song would have been worked on for Milk & Honey, unless putting something on the backburner now means the exact opposite of what it used to state. Johnleemk | Talk 17:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the Studio Quotation[edit]

In the last part of the In the Studio section, there is a large quotation indent, which is usually used for long quotes from a single source. Here it is used with several short quotes in quick succession. I'm wondering if it should still be indented. Alex 20:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Martin not interested in the project[edit]

Is there a citation for this statement?

I remember an interview with George Martin saying he hadn't been asked to produce Free as a Bird - with a hint of bitterness. Paul said during interviews at the time of release that George (Harrison) wanted Jeff Lynne, Paul conceeded that George Martin's hearing had deteriorated to the extent that Martin wasn't the right person to produce the new stuff.


Apepper 09:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of "surprisingly did not use his Hofner bass"[edit]

It's not that suprising that Paul didn't use his Hofner bass. He changed the bass he used for recording in 1965; Geoff Emerick said in Complete Beatle Recording Sessions that Paperback writer was recorded using a Rickenbacker bass. The Beatles seems to have moved to Fender basses around 1967.

Apepper 09:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Thought to have been written"???[edit]

Some editors keep restoring the first sentence to:

"'Real Love' is a song thought to have been written by John Lennon, although according to his widow Yoko Ono, it was quite well known that the song may have been bootlegged."

That sentence is poorly written. The logic of the assertion is not clear and who is asserting it isn't clear either: who thinks the song was written by Lennon and who doesn't? Rgarding the logic, bootlegging has nothing to do with authorship; the quote from Ono indicates that unauthorized people distributed unofficial versions of the song prior to when she gave the tapes to McCartney.

No evidence has been presented that there is a dispute over the authorship of the song. If any editor wants to restore the above sentence or something like it, he or she should be prepared to offer citable, reliable evidence. John Cardinal (talk) 13:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Real-love2.jpg[edit]

Image:Real-love2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:REALLUV1.JPG[edit]

Image:REALLUV1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Lennon song[edit]

Shouldn't the title of the article be "Real Love (John Lennon song)"? He wrote it after the Beatles were broken up, and they just polished it up as a single two decades later. Kahlil88 (talk) 03:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be changed as well. Is there any way we can vote on the name change? User:Chasesboys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.223.11.244 (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics[edit]

An "inside" observer told me that Lennon actually received Real Love (with a different title "Alone" or something like that), in the mail from a fan, and re-worded much of it before recording it in his apartment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prime48 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:John Lennon - Imagine John Lennon.jpg[edit]

The image File:John Lennon - Imagine John Lennon.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How is this a John Lennon song when all of the beatles played on it, released it as a beatle single and on a beatles album...[edit]

? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.28.185 (talk) 02:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was originally by John Lennon. Didn't you read the page at all, or did you see the title and immediatly come make a complaint?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Real Love (Beatles song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Real Love (Beatles song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second version of video[edit]

The video was also re-edited to include more footage of Paul with Linda, George with Olivia and Ringo with Barbara, as Yoko was the only Beatle wife shown in the first version. My source is The Beatles Book, but as all my back issues are thousands of miles away in my dad's attic, I won't be getting the issue or page numbers any time soon. Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced speculation[edit]

I removed unsourced speculation that Now and Then will the Beatles next single. I've been following this news for months and, so far, there has been no official confirmation that the next song will be Now and Then or when it will be released. There's been widespread speculation but nothing concrete beyond an unnamed song being released sometime in 2023. If I am wrong, please cite some reliable sources. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What was it recorded on?[edit]

Was John Lennon's voice taken from a cassette or open reel to reel tape? The article does not say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:B607:3D00:EB59:8B0B:5F8:E16F (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lennon used a cheap handheld tape recorder to record his demos. The article says "handheld tape recorder" which would have been a cassette. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 13:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Real_Love_(Beatles_song)&oldid=1209284703"