Talk:Raid (military)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Expanded[edit]

I expanded things a bit because the old page was too modern and too culturally specific. See Military history for more reasons. --Rcollman 14:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

Suggest creation of Category:Military raids. There are certainly enough of them in history--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 02:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I'd suggest finding a different image for this article. The one currently used doesn't strike me as suitable.Intothatdarkness (talk) 15:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about these? They seem to capture more of the concept of a military raid.

Monstrelet (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either one looks good to me. Far better than something with Holocaust connotations.Intothatdarkness (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements to article[edit]

The article now has a historical development structure, but needs further improvements

Land - a coherent development between the middle ages and WWII e.g. ACW cavalry raids, trench raiding in WWI
Sea - Morgan's Panama raid, 18th. & 19th. century naval raids, Zeebruge
Air - the whole airborne raiding area e.g. Eben Emael, Entebbe, heliborne raids
A section on doctrine - e.g. raiding strategies

Please do what you can to help Monstrelet (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No article in Japanese edition[edit]

I tried to remove the langlink but couldn't find it in source. --Ypacaraí (talk) 04:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]