This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Google gave me nearly 45.000 hits for "rahul peter das" (without other name forms). Is that enough for notability?Anuragi (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Anuragi. Prof. Das is one of the doyens of Modern South Asian Studies in Germany and also a board member of an important organisation of which the Indian PM is a founder-member. On my notability scale, that is very high. So the deletion request mystified me. Then I had a look at Gillyweed's profile and all was clear. The article is not Anglo related! Also, it was not loud, but toned down. Importance is seemingly given only if one shouts. Anyway, I suggest also having a look at the other language sites Anu mentioned. Gandupada (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The request to delete this article on grounds of too little notability was itself deleted. Reasons: That this person is notable is evinced already by the fact that there is not only an English, but also a German and a Russian page on him; that would surely not be the case otherwise. As to missing references: the article is quite heavily referenced with links to various sites from which the person's biodata as well as his complete publications (many of them important in his field) can be seen, as well as pages to the various organs edited or coedited, which are all notable in their own right. I wonder very much who would be "notable" if this person is not. Anuragi (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
