Talk:Radius of maximum wind

Radius of maximum wind has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Thunderstorms / Tornadoes / General Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Radius of maximum wind/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Just one minor grammatical issue in the lead, which I fixed, otherwise it's a well-written article. I'm passing the article, nicely done DR. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

Should it be "Radius of maximum wind" or "Radius of maximum winds"? Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 22:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radius of maximum wind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071129132811/http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/32/reports/docs/05/mmwalsh5.pdf to http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/32/reports/docs/05/mmwalsh5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Radius of maximum wind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206133851/http://www.nwas.org/ej/hsu/hsu_babin_2005.pdf to http://www.nwas.org/ej/hsu/hsu_babin_2005.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100728000814/http://www.esl.lsu.edu/quicklinks/publications/pdfs/Blanchard.et.al.NWAEJOperationalMeteorology.2006.pdf to http://www.esl.lsu.edu/quicklinks/publications/pdfs/Blanchard.et.al.NWAEJOperationalMeteorology.2006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]