Talk:Radio Academy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Sprawling lists[edit]

Per WP:IINFO, I'm not sure we need a full list of fellows, patrons and hall of fame inductees: "Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles." - it would be more helpful to the reader to say something like "the Academy has a hundred patrons, including X, Y and Z" rather than leaving them to slog through the list in order to form their own conclusions about the nature of these patrons. --McGeddon (talk) 15:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi McGeddon, I see your point. I just wanted to update the info in the current page, which was out of date, before tackling the overall layout. I'd suggest leaving the Hall of Fame members, as they all have their own Wikipedia pages and I think it would be of interest to people to be able to click through to them. If I remove the lists of Patrons and Fellows, would it be acceptable to include a comment that the full lists are featured on the official website, or do I have to just do a simple reference with a link to the relevant webpage? NellaS-H (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Radio Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/63mNGrql2?url=http://www.radioacademy.org/hall-of-fame/ to http://www.radioacademy.org/hall-of-fame/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150901030000/http://www.radioacademy.org/about/honours/ to http://www.radioacademy.org/about/honours/
Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/63mNGrql2?url=http://www.radioacademy.org/hall-of-fame/ to http://www.radioacademy.org/hall-of-fame
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116115029/http://www.radioacademy.org/about/fellows/ to http://www.radioacademy.org/about/fellows

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]