Talk:Równia pod Śnieżką

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Poland

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

On 7 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Sněžka Plateau. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 7 March 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Równia pod Śnieżką → Sněžka Plateau
Przełęcz Karkonoska → Giant Mountains Pass
Czeskie Kamienie → Czech Stones

– Per Wikipedia:UE - The choice between anglicized and local spellings should follow English-language usage, e.g. the non-anglicized titles Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard, and Göttingen are used because they predominate in English-language reliable sources, whereas for the same reason the anglicized title forms Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence are used (as opposed to Nürnberg, Delikatessen, and Firenze, respectively). In case of these articles, there are too few reliable English sources about the subject to establish consistent use of Polish names in English.

The following policy from Wikipedia:UE, which specifically refers to geographical objects and structures, applies here instead: For lesser known geographical objects or structures with few reliable English sources, follow the translation convention, if any, used for well known objects or structures of the same type e.g. because Rheintal and Moseltal are translated Rhine Valley and Moselle Valley, it makes sense to translate lesser known valley names in the same way.

Therefore, I propose moving the articles to their English-name equivalents. Max19582 (talk) 08:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. "... should follow English-language usage..." No sources were submitted. These are fan translations, none of these names are used in English sources. Przełęcz Karkonoska is sometimes called Karkonosze Pass (for example Lonely Planet), but the name does not seem to me to be very rooted in English sources. Sněžka Plateau – google didn't find a different result than the one on the wiki. Czech Stones is a nonsensical name if only because the literal translation is Bohemian Stones. Nothing like that is used and it is not even obvious why the Polish version of the name is translated and not the Czech one. FromCzech (talk) 08:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FromCzech: For lesser known geographical objects or structures with few reliable English sources, follow the translation convention If you have reliable sources that showcase the Polish names being predominantly used in English, feel free to provide them. Otherwise we should follow the translation convention.

If you have any better translations, feel free to suggest them. As for translating Czeskie Kamienie, I'm fine with both translating it as "Bohemian Stones", as well as translating the Czech variant instead. We may also name the article something along the lines of "[x] and [y] Stones" since I see you merged the article with Śląskie Kamienie. Max19582 (talk) 08:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although I do agree for Równia pod Śnieżką specifically to after all use the Polish name. I found some relevant sources, such as [1] or [2]. Max19582 (talk) 09:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any translation of Czeskie Kamienie is wrong and unintuitive for the user, because it is not a naming of stones, but a naming of a mountain. FromCzech (talk) 09:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oppose per WP:USENATIVE—blindlynx 17:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.