Talk:Quantum weirdness

This page was proposed for deletion by Johnjbarton (talk · contribs) on 16 March 2024.

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Delete or convert to article about the book[edit]

This seems like a list of things someone does not understand. The idea that some but not other aspects of QM are "not intuitive" or that QM vs say relativity or electromagnetism is "not intuitive" have no basis in other than personal opinion.

Rather than deleting some on could convert this to an article about the book with the same title. However the book does not seem notable. Only 11 citations on Google Scholar, 3 reviews on Amazon, and a professional review paned it (https://www-tandfonline-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1080/00107514.2017.1344313) Johnjbarton (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged it. Do an AfD, or I will in a week or so (to give a little time for improvement). It appears to be WP:OR and WP:SYNTHESIS, without sources to back it up, just statements. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]