Talk:Quainton Road railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleQuainton Road railway station is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starQuainton Road railway station is part of the Brill Tramway series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 14, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 24, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
October 5, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

New material at Claydon RS re Claydon Jn[edit]

Would a regular editor here care to review the material that I have added to Claydon railway station regarding Claydon Junction, please. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One point missing[edit]

Shouldn't the fact that Chiltern Railways on special occaisions serves this station be mentioned? Simply south...... trying to improve for 5 years 21:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


External links[edit]

Where are they? Jackiespeel (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackiespeel: Did you have any in mind? ELs are not required: they are one of the five standard appendices, all of which are optional (but you'll have a hard time getting an article to FA-class w/o some refs). --Redrose64 (talk) 10:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just reads odd to have just the info box. Perhaps [1] and [2] on the Disused Stations website? (My interest is only tangential.) Jackiespeel (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
By "the info box", I take it you mean the box headed "Preceding station Historical railways Following station" - that's not an infobox (there's an infobox top right of the lead section) but a succession box, and so is not one of the appendices but one of the WP:FOOTERS, as are the two navboxes below it. That box beginning "Wikimedia Commons has ..." is a link to sister project, not part of the footers but normally placed at the top of the last section. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My recollection is that if sister links are the only links to external websites (treating other Wikimedia sites as external for these purposes) then we can use {{Commons category-inline}} instead, which I'll do now. BencherliteTalk 16:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Generalist WPists' are likely to call any boxed information including 'predecessor/successor' and 'next stations' infoboxes - and I did provide a link (but am not sufficiently into WP-trains-project to know what is being looked for) Jackiespeel (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quainton Road railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]