Talk:Primary standard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

dead link[edit]

The external link is dead. 404 error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.105.118 (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need some non-chemical examples[edit]

eg Caesium standard for frequency, Atomic clock#Fountain standard for time, and maybe Deadweight tester for calibrating pressure gauges ? - Rod57 (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page is really about a chemical standard, which even isn't necessarily a primary standard. The page should be retitled something like "Standard (chemistry)" and the existing title changed to link to the "Standards (metrology)" page, which duplicates the introductory information on this page and discusses Primary, Secondary, and Working standards in a more general context. HiTechHiTouch (talk) 08:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this may need some reorganization/renaming. For the time being, I have more tightly cross-linked the articles, so that readers will at least find the information relevant for them. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 17:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

standard / standard / standard[edit]

Care should be taken not to confuse the several meanings of how the word is used:

  1. An abstract reference (e.g. IACS)
  2. An actual instance of an object against which others are compared (e.g. Gauge block, the original kg "prototype")
  3. A regulation (e.g. law, IEEE, IEC)
  4. A de facto situation (e.g. the standard of living)

See the confusion with the term "working standard" which is used to describe a pound weight and a minimum wage law
--BjKa (talk) 13:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]