Talk:Philip N. Diehl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I've posted my first article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rittenhoused/Philip_N._Diehl

Why is the User:Rittenhoused/ prefix added to the title on this page and how do I get rid of it. Thanks.

Rittenhoused (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently a user page. If you are autoconfirmed, you can move the page and remove the prefix. Frozen Windwant to be chilly? 06:25, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remarks here[edit]

Please do not make changes to Mr Diehl's page. It is in the process of revision per his staff. If you have remarks please add them here for review. -mickeyp2814 MIckeyp2814 (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Mr Diehl nor his staff should be editing this page. Please review policies on conflicts of interest before proceeding. Dusty|💬|You can help! 14:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mickeyp2814, I replied to you on my talk page. Like I stated there, see WP:Conflict of interest (what Dusty relic pointed to), especially the WP:Paid editing part of it.
And you should remember to properly sign your username at the end of the comments you make on Wikipedia talk pages. All you have to do to sign your username is simply type four tildes (~), like this: ~~~~. I signed your registered username for you above; it is actually MIckeyp2814, not Mickey2814 or Mickeyp2814. Flyer22 (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But are you User:Mickeyp2814? For example, this...and also with the lack of a proper signature. It seems highly unlikely that two users would come up with the username Mickeyp2814, with the only difference being the letter I is in lowercase in one of the usernames. Flyer22 (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Flyer22 I am that same Mickey2814 but I deleted that account a year or so ago. When I recreated my account I accidently made the "I" a capitol. Also I noticed some things did not look as they once did thus me not signing the pages correctly. I am just getting back to editing in Wikipedia after a long time away. Please look over the Philip Diehl page and let me know if it is not to the Wikipedia standard. In the mean time I will do my homework and read the conflict of interest sections in Wikipedia. MIckeyp2814 (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion opened at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Philip N. Diehl.--ukexpat (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
mickeyp2814 - It is inappropriate for you to tell other editors not to make changes to an article. Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, and no one has the right to act as if they can dictate an article's content. See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. --Drm310 (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Drm310 - I apologize for the stating a user not to edit a Wikipedia page however the edits were reverted back to the old version and I am trying to bring this up page up to date. Also there is no conflict of interest as stated before. If you read the page it is not bias. It simply is the history of Mr. Diehl’s service and career. There were inaccurate statements on the page and I am simply helping to bring the page current. MIckeyp2814 (talk) 14:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]