Talk:Philebus

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ancient philosophy

Footnotes 3–6 in need of revision[edit]

The footnotes no. 3–6 are not specific enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wieselwendig (talk • contribs) 10:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rough translation tag[edit]

I've added a rough translation tag for this article - the state it's in now is certainly better than the article was before, and I don't think it should be reverted back to that state, but reading through there are too many inconsistencies and awkward phrasings such as "The representation starts abruptly in an ongoing conversation", so I've added the tag. Psychastes (talk) 05:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That seems appropriate.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reviewing and copy-editing, sorry for the poor quality of the work. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to be looking for a Plato dialogue to work on anyway, it's not the end of the world. :o) Psychastes (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Working on cleaning up the citations now, I suspect given the differences between policy that a lot of them, (especially the references to commentaries such as Frede, Benardete, and Delcomminette) are really suggestions for further reading so we should probably verify that they're actually supporting the text. Probably we don't want to rely too heavily on Delcomminette anyway unless it's necessary since this is enwiki and that work is in French. There are certainly also other commentaries (Gosling, Hackforth, Davidson, etc.) that could be referenced that are available in English.

As far as sourcing, it doesn't seem like there's anything dubious so far, a lot of the article is summarizing the dialogue which typically doesn't need secondary citations anyway, and the primary ones mostly look fine to me based on what's written and my own familiarity with the dialogue. I don't think any content needs to be removed on this basis, we just need to make sure we're not attributing things to people who didn't say them! Psychastes (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For housekeeping I'll also plan on converting the citations over to short footnotes and collecting a bibliography at the end; many of them are to the same few works, and the length of individual footnotes in the German version is quite long and difficult to read easily. Psychastes (talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed Delcomminette from all inline citations after finding several examples where the text was just a summary of the work with no claims being made requiring further verification. Anyone who wants to consult that work (which is full commentary) can use the provided table of contents in that work to find the page numbers associated with each section of the philebus, we don't need to separately record them here. No objections to that source being included in the future if someone wants to add content to the article that is actually supported by it. Psychastes (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]