Talk:Peter Arno

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 01:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mention in Wired[edit]

FYI, a mention in Wired...

http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2008/07/google_knol

Talking about how little info there is on Arno on the Internet. -- Fuzheado | Talk 07:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This news item is not relevant to the article, except that it shows that Arno is notable, which is hopefully established. He is given as an example of the scarcity of knowledge on many subjects. Its nice to see him mentioned though.66.80.6.163 (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article history[edit]

Someone added an extensive biographical section, which was removed out of copyright concerns. The material was sourced, though not with inline citations. Bpth the addition and deletion seem to be good faith efforts to improve the article. It would be great to add this material back in a shortened or rewritten format. This is why its good to talk about significant additions or deletions from articles, so that another editor can immediately get a sense of the articles history, and perhaps go back through it and rescue otherwise salvageable data. Sorry I cant to that myself, im always saying "ill get to that" out of guilt, and of course 90% of the time i dont. any takers?(mercurywoodrose)66.80.6.163 (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]